Brunson vs Sotomayor, Et Al

A Ticking Time Bomb

While the entire world fixated on the Trump court case proceedings in New York, another major court case was unfolding nearly simultaneously. On 5/28/24, 3 supreme court justices recused themselves from the Brunson vs Sotomayor case. The 3 justices who recused themselves were: Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

These three Supreme Court justices were named in the case when it was filed on 2/9/24 so it might seem fitting and orderly for them to recuse themselves. However, they are under no obligation to do so. So why recuse?

Every Liberal Supreme Court Justice Sits Out Decision in Rare Move (5/28/24)

It is not every day in the United States where one man is able to have a court case reach the Supreme Court twice. It looks as if Mr. Raland J. Brunson (aka the “Brunson brothers”) may lay claim to this inconceivable feat. This brief video does a pretty good job explaining the facts surrounding this story.

As you might recall, the Brunson vs Adams case was brought forth in the early part of 2021. To fully understand the magnitude of Brunson vs Sotomayor, one must first understand the Brunson vs Adams case. This case presented astounding factual evidence that proved beyond a reasonable doubt that there should have been an investigation into the outcome of the 2020 election.

Mr. Brunson argued that the failure to investigate the 2020 election represented a violation of his Constitutional rights and an act of treason involving members of Congress. Written objections, citing concerns that fraud occurred in the 2020 election, were filed and then acting Vice-President Mike Pence certified that these objections were filed properly. After that, no further action was taken to investigate.

…said Defendants were requested to investigate possible voter/election fraud; and that said Defendants failed and neglected to investigate.

With these claims, Brunson asked for the removal of members of Congress, including the removal of Biden and Harris from their positions as President and Vice President. Here is a quote from the Brunson vs Adams court documents with comments from our team added in ( ).

On March 23, 2021 (just 2 months after Biden’s inauguration), pro se Plaintiff Loy Arlan Brunson filed suit against over 300 current and former federal government officials, including members of the United States Congress, President Biden, Vice President Harris, and former Vice President Pence. Brunson brought six causes of action, alleging Defendants violated the law by failing to investigate the 2020 presidential election.

This failure to investigate violated the Constitution and each and every US citizen’s Constitutional rights. Jack Straw stated it correctly back in April. Congress breached the Constitution.

A petition for a writ of certiorari was filed on 10/20/22. Case 22-380 was docketed in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit on 10/24/22. This petition was denied as 1/9/23.

Oddly, it was on the date of 1/6/23 that the case was reviewed by the Supreme Court. January 6 may become quite the memorable day in the history books.

The U.S. Supreme Court denied petition to hear case alleging fraudulent 2020 election (1/13/23)

Another petition for a writ of certiorari was filed on 4/19/23. Case 22-1028 was docketed in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit on 4/24/23. This petition was denied on 6/26/23.

These court cases remind all of us that the most dangerous weapon in the world is a patriotic American, and especially one that is standing up for his/her Constitutional rights.

The case of Brunson vs Sotomayor No. 23-4108 is the follow-up or follow through to the Brunson vs Adams case. Brunson vs Sotomayor is, in essence, an appeal that grew out of the disagreement over the outcome in that prior suit. Reading directly from the Brunson vs Sotomayor court documents with our team’s comments added in (), the case is summarized here.

In that suit (Brunson vs Adams), Mr. Raland Brunson challenged the outcome of the 2020 presidential election. The district court dismissed the suit, we affirmed, and the Supreme Court denied certiorari. Mr. Brunson brought a second suit, which we now address. In the second suit, Mr. Brunson sued three Associate Justices of the Supreme Court (Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson) in their official capacities for denying certiorari in the prior case. The second suit began in state court, and the three Justices removed the action to federal district court. The district court ordered dismissal, concluding that the Justices enjoyed sovereign immunity. We affirm. When an action is removed from state court, the federal court considers whether the state court had jurisdiction. If jurisdiction existed in state court, the federal court generally acquires jurisdiction if removal is otherwise appropriate. Lambert Run Coal Co. v. Baltimore & O.R. Co., 258 U.S. 377, 382 (1922). We call this jurisdiction “derivative” because the federal court’s jurisdiction derives from the state court’s.

Do you understand the magnitude of the Brunson vs Sotomayor case? If Brunson vs Sotomayor moves forward, the prior case of Brunson vs Adams would suddenly be back on the table.

Think logically! Please remove your “politically fogged” prescription glasses, put on your continuity of government (COG) bifocals, and ponder this. Would it be possible for the US military to be holding all the evidence involving the 2020 election fraud? And is it possible that the 2020 election results were certified illegally, without any formal investigation ever occurring that would have uncovered the evidence held by the US military? And would this dynamic allow for the US military to operate legally and constitutionally (and covertly) under the Law of War manual, with the previously elected POTUS (Donald J. Trump) continuing forward as Commander In Chief at the time of inauguration of Joseph R. Biden? These dynamics would create the proverbial PERFECT 4 year stand-still or PAUSE, if you will.

All we know is that the BOOMERANG effect resulting from a favorable ruling in the Brunson vs Sotomayor court case would be absolutely monumental. “Drain the swamp” would take on a whole new meaning if over 300 enemy combatants were handcuffed and ushered out of DC for acts of treason.

Did an insurrection occur on January 6? Damn straight, it did. It was just the exact opposite of the US MSM’s narrative. A fraudulent election was certified. This is and was the act of insurrection that occurred on 1/6/21.

How many of the remaining 6 supreme court justices need to rule in favor of the Brunson case moving foward?

Based on our limited research and comments on Raland Brunson’s website, it appears that the answer is 4.

How do you think each will vote? John Roberts Nay? Clarence Thomas Yay?

Very few, if any, Supreme Court case decisions have weighed more heavily than this one. The future of the USA Republic may quite literally rest in the balance. And how do you know this case is a ticking time bomb? It is receiving the silent treatment from the US MSM. Where there is silence, there is the story. Where there is silence, there is the bomb.

And do not dismiss this simple fact too quickly. During Brunson vs Adams, the Brunson brothers asked American citizens concerned about election fraud to contribute $1 or $2 to the cause to show their support. We are aware of a few people, and you may know others, who mailed letters to the Supreme Court and sent small donations to the Brunson brothers. Plainly stated, the Brunson vs Adams case is backed by thousands of American patriots, not just one. Will the written letters of many be mightier than the fraudulent election sword?

It looks like some dark clouds are beginning to gather to the west.

Fraud really does vitiate everything!

---

Other sources and related links:

Epoch Times: Three liberal Supreme Court justices recuse themselves in lawsuit over 2000 election case (5/29/24)

NTD: 3 Liberal Supreme Court Justices Recuse Themselves in Lawsuit Over 2020 Election Case (5/29/24)

The Signal: Three liberal Supreme Court justices recuse themselves in lawsuit over 2020 election (5/29/24)

Enough Is Enough - Raland Brunson’s website