International Sugar Agreement Of 1937
Paving The Way For The Monopoly On Consumer Goods
Our team thought a little comfort food was in order so stay with us on this topic. We are serving up a tasty treat today!
As many of you know, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. announced that he was suspending his 2024 campaign and endorsing Trump. His speech from 8/23/24 is really a must listen as he covers multiple topics that extend way beyond politics.
We are sharing this post to provide some context to his comments starting from the 29:30 mark as he shared several troubling stats on the current health crisis in the US.
In Japan, the childhood obesity rate is 3%, compared to 50% here.
Today, 1 out of every 3 kids (in the US) is diabetic or pre-diabetic.
Why are we letting this happen to our children? We are mass poisoning all of our children!”
How did we get to this place? What prompted all of this? When exactly did this health crisis begin to take shape?
Well, let’s explore some history to see if we can shed some light on this.
In 1937, an international agreement or treaty was put in place to regulate the production and marketing of sugar. It would appear that the initial publicized intent of this agreement was to "always assure consumers of an adequate supply of sugar on the world market at a reasonable price not to exceed the cost of production, including a reasonable profit, of efficient producers."
The International Sugar Agreements and similarly named agreements were a series of International treaties that attempted to establish an "orderly relationship between the supply and demand for sugar in the world market." They eventually established the International Sugar Organization.
The International Sugar Organization (ISO) was founded in 1968 as a result of the 1937 treaty.
The International Sugar Organization (ISO) is based in London, England.
Per the ISO website, this is the organization’s primary role.
The International Sugar Organization is the unique intergovernmental body devoted to improving conditions on the world's sugar market through Debate, Analysis, Special Studies, Transparent Statistics, Seminars, Conferences and Workshops.
Similar to the World Health Organization (WHO) handling “all things health,” this international conglomerate of highly educated and incredibly brave men and women basically handle “all things sugar” so none of us have to ever worry about having enough. And to think, where would we be without WHO and ISO?
The International Sugar Organization established under the International Sugar Agreement, 1968, and maintained in existence under the International Sugar agreements, 1973, 1977, 1984 and 1987, shall continue in being for the purpose of administering this Agreement and supervising its operation, with the membership, powers and functions set out in this Agreement.
In 1977, the United Nations adopted an update to the International Sugar Agreement.
This agreement was signed in New York City on 12/9/77. The primary purpose of the agreement was to keep sugar prices low to ultimately promote consumption. This “treaty” update ended up being quite the sugar treat for Americans.
Sugar consumption has only been on the rise since as it is now normal for healthy teenagers to skip breakfast and consume sugar laced Starbucks coffees/mochas/lattes first thing in the morning. Many of these “specialty” drinks have exorbitantly high levels of sugar.
The same could be said for most “energy” drinks as many are absolutely throttled with dangerously high levels of sugar.
Shifting gears….when exactly did the food pyramid get flipped on end? We might suggest that one impetus was when bread and cereal became laced with sugar and other additives. The “pyramid” taught us all to eat a lot of bread and a lot of cereal.
The first dietary pyramid was published in Sweden in 1974 followed by the United States (US) pyramid in 1992. The idea was to illustrate that foods that should be consumed in greater amounts should be located in the base of the pyramid, while those that should be eaten sparingly should be at the top.
The 1992 pyramid introduced by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) was called the "Food Guide Pyramid" or "Eating Right Pyramid". It was updated in 2005 to "MyPyramid", and then it was replaced by "MyPlate" in 2011.
And how have Americans fared since adhering to the “food pyramid” and enjoying life under the rule of the International Sugar organization?
Well, let’s take a quick peak at the obesity rates to see if any trends have emerged over the past 30-60 years. It would appear to us that the intentional plan to promote sugar consumption worked. It has basically led to a US population that is abhorrently unhealthy with an increasing number of people morbidly obese. The obesity rate trends are quite staggering.
And to think that perfectly healthy adults are consuming 10-20 packets of sugar in their morning lattes each and every day.
And we are not talking about just a few companies offering sugar laced products. With just 11 or 12 companies controlling the majority of the consumer goods sector, one can hardly escape the onslaught on our food supply. Some refer to this as the “Food Industrial Complex.”
The 1937 International Sugar Agreement cracked the door open and the 1977 International Sugar Agreement opened the floodgates. Additional mundane updates were made to the International Sugar Agreement treaty in 1992, but the damage was already done.
In the end, this is and has never been about real sugar. The real damage occurred when REAL sugar (which the body needs) was demonized and replaced with fake sugars, like high fructose corn syrup and other sugar substitutes. Plainly stated, the consumption of chemicals at high levels is dangerous.
So what is currently happening on the topic of toxic food ingredients at the state and federal level?
A handful of states are already banning or proposed bans are pending on certain foods that most Americans are still consuming daily. Oddly, California is one of the states to outright ban certain products due to harmful food additives. A day could soon come when Nevada residents will be running Lucky Charms across the state line into California, like moonshine.
Many of the mysteriously named dyes like Yellow 5, Yellow 6, Red 40 and Titanium Dioxide are already outlawed in Europe. One does not have to look far to see that the ingredients list for most “foods” in the US looks quite different from other countries.
Per other sources, it has been documented that titanium oxide is the same ingredient that is used in car paint to make our vehicles look “shiny.”
Watchdog group to consumers: Avoid titanium dioxide (12/5/22)
Titanium dioxide nanoparticles may accumulate and cause DNA damage
More than 2000 “foods” contain titanium oxide
Skittles was sued for containing titanium dioxide. (7/23/22)
It is also interesting to note that Rep. Anna Paulina Luna just introduced the “Do or Dye Act” in early June. Her bill reads that food containing certain color additives are to be “deemed adulterated.”
Plainly stated, it is now an established fact that certain food additives and dyes cause irreparable harm to people. And how is this being presented by certain media outlets? The poo-poo strategy appears to be the play by some. Are processed foods laced with chemicals really that bad for you?
Are you seeing what happened here? First sugar….then high fructose corn syrup…then sugar alternatives….then color additives/dyes that all lead to major health issues. Whether it is saccharin (aka Equal, Sweet N Low), aspartame, sucralose (aka Splenda), or other dyes or artificial, chemically enhanced sweeteners, it all started with the “advancement” of sugar. And it all became quite dangerous when real sugar was demonized and it was replaced aggressively with chemical alternatives. Aspartame is one good example as it is basically a drug that offers no nutritional value and a laundry list of side effects.
And why are grocery stores across the US still filled to the brim with one aisle after another of sugar laced food or chemically adulterated food chocked full of harmful dyes and incredibly unhealthy ingredients?
We might suggest to you that the weakening of a nation does not happen overnight. However, it can happen over a 40-60 year time period.
Remember, the goal of the globalist elites was to control the population on every level, including the food that was to be consumed. A slow, deliberate poisoning of the population would also have a “positive” impact on the overall goal of depopulation.
Ideological warfare is subtle. The weapons used are craftily worded, sweet to the taste, international agreements that firmly establish oversight by a select few. The international sugar agreement of 1937 was a subtle act of infiltration, not invasion.
It is almost as if we have been at war with some sort of “invisible enemy” for quite some time now, and the weapons used by this “invisible enemy” come in many forms.
The “Maha Collective” of citizen journalists at The Fruited Plain would suggest to you that a movement has officially begun to Make America Healthy Again (MAHA)!
Are you beginning to understand the magnitude of the Chevron case?
Dr. Tenpenny shared an exceptional article on this topic on 7/20/24. This article is a must read. Dr. Tenpenny opens the reader’s eyes to what is to come for “federal” behemoths like HHS, CDC, CMS, FDA, and Obamacare.
Gone are the days of the USDA or FDA or any consumer products company simply deciding to add a poisonous ingredient into our foods or swap out real, healthy sugar for chemically produced, high fructose corn syrup just because they can. We are likely on the cusp of witnessing the incredible transformation of American made food products. Pay close attention as we will likely witness a slow, subtle transition from eating incredibly addictive, chemically laced, man-made “food” sprinkled with insects to consuming natural, God-made food.
Our team would highly recommend that you all keep reading the list of ingredients on those product labels so you can begin to see the changes already happening real time. Some of our describers use the YUKA app to scan bar codes in stores to see which ingredients may be more harmful than others.